Showing posts with label Donald Sutherland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Donald Sutherland. Show all posts

Monday, April 2, 2012

The Hunger Games

               As I've touched on before in this blog, adapting a book into a movie can be quite difficult. From dealing with scenes that have trouble translating to something visual, to the always painful task of cutting detail in order to create a running time suitable for the story and the audience. Then there's always the challenge of having to do this process with a hugely popular best-seller not only in America, but around the world. This can make any fan nervous as we've seen the good and the bad come from this challenge. From the model franchise of Harry Potter to the not so good Twilight series (yes, I know it's made a fortune and I haven't read the books, but I saw the first one and it was terrible, but feel free to disagree),  the question is whether The Hunger Games was able to live up to its fans expectations.
              Though it has already claimed the top spot at the box-office in its first two weekends, are audience getting what they hoped for when forking over $11 a ticket?  In my opinion they are. Writer/Director Gary Ross (Seabiscuit, Pleasantville) has condensed the story into a very well managed 2 hours and 20 minutes. As with any such story details had to be cut, but it includes all of the important aspects of this story as well as what is needed to continue on to the next story in the trilogy. A huge key in this success is the fact author Suzanne Collins is one of the trio, along with Ross, in adapting the screenplay. There's no doubt having her involved so closely in the adaptation process is what helped keep all the major events that happen in the book, to happen exactly the same way in the movie. Another applauding fact to this script is the way they dealt with the book's first person narrative. Due to this there's a lot of information told to a reader that needs to be shown to a viewer. To solve this the writers used many different ways to portray such info to the audience, from plainly showing a narrative text on the screen to coming up with a whole new scene in general, such as the one when the Tracker Jackers are explained.
              For those who are now lost by the lingo just used and are new to the story, The Hunger Games is set in the futuristic ruins of North America, in the country of Panem. The evil Capitol requires each of its 12 impoverished districts to every year volunteer a boy and a girl between the ages of 12 and 18, chosen via a draft, to fight to the death in an arena (and you thought the US was in rough shape). The story follows Katniss Everdeen, played by Jennifer Lawrence (Winter's Bone, X-Men: First Class), of District 12 who volunteers to fight to save her sister. She is sent along with fellow District 12 tribute Peeta Mellark, played by Josh Hutcherson (The Kids Are All Right). He is a non-threatening looking, but surprisingly strong individual who is yet insecure and has a much bigger role then he could ever imagine. From here the plot line travels parallel to that of the book's, as Katniss must find a way to survive in and out of the games in an ever changing landscape while somehow protecting all of those around her with whom she loves and cares for.
            As for the casting of this movie, which is quite important in highly popular adaptations, I believe the casting people hit their mark with most of the characters. Lawrence is perfect in portraying Katniss as the very self-reliant, reserved, person that she is. Some may not be happy with the choice of Hutcherson as Peeta, but when it comes down to it he's a good fit as he portrays the main important qualities Peeta is supposed to have. Those being his sincerity, loyalty, kindness and sensitivity. He may not be that heart throb some people want, but he's not supposed to be. That's more reserved for Gale (Liam Hemsworth), Katniss' best friend, who from the brief exposure seems to be a good fit.
         The best job casting wise has to go to Haymithch Abernathy, the drunken sad-sack mentor to Katniss and Peeta, who is played by Woody Harrelson (Friends With Benefits). Just think of his character in Zombieland and translate it to this film. It's perfect. Other notables are Stanley Tucci (Easy A) as Caeasar Flickerman, Elizabeth Banks as Effie Trinket, who's hard to even recognize under her Capitol wardrobe, Donald Sutherland as President Snow, and Lenny Kravitz as Katniss' stylist Cinna.
          Overall, I give this movie a thumbs up and 3 1/2 out of 4 stars. For me this movie was pretty much everything I could have hoped it would be when seeing it on the big screen. It's unrealistic to expect it to be exactly like the book. All you can hope for is it's the best version possible when going by the constraints of a movie and this is pretty darn close. What's even better is if you haven't read the book you'll still enjoy this movie. It's that good of a story on its own. However, if you haven't read it there's a good chance the movie will make you want to read it, and that to me is what makes a good adaptation. Just ask Harry Potter. Enjoy!



Editor's Note: Due to my long absence and the fact I have watched a handful of movies in that time I'm not sure which movie I'll review next. As always if I see one in theaters, like The Hunger Games, it gets priority. Otherwise, it could be Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo or a couple others so stay tuned to see what's next!
 

Monday, July 11, 2011

Horrible Bosses

           Who has never had a job that they didn't hate or at least just not want to do for the rest of their lives? Plenty of you I'm sure, I know I have. Well, what about actually having a job you enjoy? Nice huh? Now how many of you have had a boss that you despise at a job you either hate or like? Makes that environment excruciating doesn't it? Makes the job you hate miserable and the job you enjoy suck. This situation is one many people out there can relate to, and is the plot line behind the movie Horrible Bosses.
           In Horrible Bosses, Jason Bateman (Couples Retreat), Charlie Day (It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia), and Jason Sudeikis (SNL), play Nick, Dale, and Kurt. They are three friends at three entirely different jobs, and they all hate their bosses for entirely different reasons. The one thing they all share with their hatred is the fact that their bosses are holding them back. When they realize that they can't just quit and get new jobs due to the terrible economy, they come up with the idea that killing each others bosses is the only way they can be happy. From here they go on to find someone who can help them pull it off without getting caught. Enter Jamie Foxx who plays their "murder consultant (I won't give you his character's name as not to ruin some hilarity)." From here the guys go about trying to devise how to take out each others boss, which in turn leads to plenty of mishaps and plenty of other stuff that goes wrong, but it all comes with plenty of laughter.
            Bateman, Day, and Sudeikis work very well together and make a believable trio of friends, all of which have extremely different personalities. Charlie Day is great and I think his career looks promising outside of "It's Always Sunny..." Though plenty of the comedy work falls on these three enough can't be said about the work of the bosses. Kevin Spacey plays Dave Harken, Nick's boss, who is completely self absorbed and psychotic. Jennifer Aniston plays Dr. Julia Harris, Dale's boss, who sexually harasses him every chance she gets and is a complete sex crazed lunatic. Finally, Colin Farrell plays Bobby Pellett, Kurt's boss, who is a coke head and just an overall terrible person. All three of these actors do a great job with their extreme characters. Jennifer Aniston in particular does, and not just because she looks sexy the entire time, but because her character is such an extreme opposite of what she usually plays, it's just plain hilarious.
            Going into Horrible Bosses I thought it had the potential to be very funny. However, I also had the feeling that the previews could have over done it and it could potentially flop. Thankfully, I am glad to say that it did not flop and was in fact very funny. The outrageousness of it all helps keep the mood light throughout, so that you aren't picking apart everything that happens that may not be totally realistic of everyday life. The writer's do a good job of mixing up material and whenever a joke may flop in your opinion, don't worry the next one will sure to make you laugh again.
              Anyways, I obviously give this movie a thumbs up and 3 out of 4 stars. It's hilarious don't get me wrong, but it has to be phenomenal to earn 4 stars. I will however be buying this once its out on DVD/Blu-Ray. This movie just came out last Friday so you all have a few weeks to go see it in theaters before it's too late. I highly recommend doing so. Enjoy!



Editor's Note: I'm going to start throwing in trailers with the films I review. Please let me know if this is a benefit or makes things too crowded. Also, I know I said Blue Valentine would be the next film to be reviewed, but I have been really busy lately and well it just didn't happen. I will be seeing Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part II at midnight Thursday night so I will do my best to put out a review ASAP after that. If I don't review Blue Valentine before Potter, then it will happen after it. Thanks and keep reading!